Monday 15 October 2018

Make Downtown Great Again!


This connects with posts:

John Dooley, CORE-Lite and - Terry Fox?
11 Sep, 2018
and
Cal Renwick: No S(CORE)
29 Aug, 2018


Nelson's downtown has come into (blurred) focus of late: not because there are particularly new issues with it - but because it's election-time, and this connects with the Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce (NDCC) - for years - directly and indirectly - fear-mongering with: all other-looking-people are drugged/mental/criminal homeless we must get rid of!
Their downtown(only!)presence is bad for business - they're also not buying our stuff.

A disingenuous attempt to pump more life (i.e. profit) into downtown: if we get rid of them the money will come!




NDCC: Gimme Your Money!

To that end - a few years ago - NDCC directors - not the general membership! - devise a resolution to kick-start an "aggressive panhandling bylaw". Without any fact-based documentation on aggressive panhandling as an ongoing reality in Nelson.

This resolution is fast-tracked to Kevin Cormack, the City's CAO, who promptly puts it on Council's agenda as a bylaw, vaguely listing the NPD and its meter-maids as originators. With neither anyone's name nor numbers of basic/aggressive panhandlers or any other City-generated fact-based evidence to back a need for such bylaw.

Council - asking few questions - seems ready to approve it: until this blogger draws their attention to the numerous inconsistencies in the proposal. Nudged by Councillor Morrison - they then start to question/discuss in-depth.
This energy to quickly form the construct of our "street culture" concerns/initiatives.

The number of panhandlers - never large - has not grown since. But - while the proven reality should have a settling affect - the NDCC, City Staff and NPD still have not produced any numbers.
Which makes one wonder whether producing them - easily doable - would actually be in the NDCC's and CAO's interest. After all - their tandem aim all along has been to rid Nelson of all untouchables, with the attempted bylaw possibly a legal way to do that.




Election: Where's My Money?

In the meantime - the bylaw dies a well-deserved death - but here they come again! They: now a more select group - candidates for Council and one re-run for the Mayor's Office. 
BUT!
Very visible among them is CORE's Cal Renwick and former mayor John Dooley: both top-tier NDCCers, seemingly aiming to get the NDCC into City Hall through the back-door!
I mean - why wouldn't they - or the media - mention this affiliation?

Both now making the current City Hall team responsible for all downtown-business woes:
Hordes of violent/mental/homeless druggies have tourists running (if true and incidentally - to wherever they would find more of what they find here);
locals are afraid to come downtown - spending no money;
the lack of Xmas lights there (only there!) - in recent years - has seriously messed with everybody's habit of buying much stuff they don't need;
the current team's neglect of Baker has turned it into a filthy, dangerous hell-hole.




Cal Renwick
He never before spoke up publicly about all of downtown's ills (above) listed in his drama-queen election-mantra. As a solution he plans to devise a new - while similar - panhandling bylaw "to curb some of the negativity and some illegal activities." Some of each - he does not explain - and ignores that the last time around such bylaw was found pointless and - possibly - illegal.
So - as Councillor he would champion a similar pointless, possibly illegal panhandling-bylaw for a problem we don't have.
Welcome to my nightmare, Cal!




John Dooley
"I also want to address civic pride...starting with Christmas lights, clean streets and a safe environment for all."
Xmas lights are the basis of civic pride. Right-on, John! Then clean streets, and a safe environment running third.

This blogger recalls him complaining years ago - while he was mayor for 9 - that downtown buildings needed cleaning/painting.
He did nothing about that then - neither did the NDCC in a possible concerted effort with its general membership - but particularly the Downtown Business Assn.  
Civic Pride, indeed.




I haven't felt unsafe downtown now and ever - and I don't find its streets dirtier. 
Yes, buildings should be cleaned/painted - but that is not the City's job.
It also is not the City's job to make downtown's small businesses laugh all the way to the bank.

Market Research 101: If you have a good-quality, reasonably priced product for which there is a consistent need/market - you're in business.
Regardless!
Ideally with the Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce, the Heritage Working Group and Nelson & Kootenay Lake Tourism having your, each other's therefore Nelson's back - with a shared vision.


Ho-Ho-Hum!



Image Credit:
memolition


Tom Thomson, NDCC - Exec. Director
tom@discovernelson.com

Deb Kozak, Mayor 
dkozak@nelson.ca

City Council
nelsoncouncil@nelson.ca

Kevin Cormack, CAO
kcormack@nelson.ca   

Thursday 4 October 2018

Rich(ichi) or not at City Hall




"The issue is people hanging around downtown. I know every one of them by name, and I hire four of them every day to clean up for me and sweep."
                             Rob Richichi/PART1: Nelson council candidates profiles
                                          Nelson Star, Sep. 26, 2018

Such empathy! - while categorizing one and all "as people who mix recreational and street drugs with their mental health issues". This - according to him - promptly leading to homelessness and - big one! - impacting "the quality of life downtown".
Which can only be upped with more cops - lots more! 



Conflict of Interest?

Rob Richichi - running for Council - is the owner of Aldo's Cleaners: on contract with City Hall for years - cleaning NPD/NFD uniforms.

This raises 2 questions:
1.
Should he (have) let this be known publicly to preempt any whispers about a possible conflict of interest in the making?
Rules do not require him to present this information when registering for his election.
One may argue though that making it public while campaigning would be the morally correct path to take: campaigns ostensibly being about building trust and confidence with the electorate.

2.
If he were to be elected: what should/would happen with his contract - if anything?
According to the Community Charter, 107 (1a): "If a municipality enters into a contract in which a council member...has a direct or indirect pecuniary interest, this must be reported as soon as reasonably practicable at a council meeting that is open to the public."

While the Charter here does not clarify what is reasonably practicable and who must do the reporting - go figure! - 

(2) then states: "In addition to the obligation under Section 100 (disclosure of conflict), a council member...must advise the corporate officer, as soon as reasonably practicable, of any contracts that must be reported under Subsection 1 in relation to that person."

In plain-speak: if he is elected - this relationship really needs to be dealt with in the first public meeting of the new Council, with the Corporate Officer having to be advised of it then by him as well.  
Nothing to hide? and all that.
Yet Richichi would have to recuse himself from any actual Council deliberations of his situation.

If he does not promptly declare a possible pecuniary conflict of interest, but Council decides that indeed it is: this could lead to disqualification from holding office. Ultimately it's up to (new, inexperienced) Council to make that decision.


The Charter does not - why not? - address a situation in which someone already is in a contractual relationship of pecuniary interest with the City when becoming Councillor. While it would be reasonable to let a contract with only little time left - how little, though? - play out: Council allowing even this may appear disengaged from the public's best interest.

Aside from the possibly problematic chronology of his (current?) contract if elected - Richichi has had a no-competing-bids hold on City Hall for ages. Has convenience for the City in his case actually superseded proper procurement-procedure? And how far can Council safely step into that territory?


Keeping in mind that in Nelson politics and business are often nudged by personal histories, and in politics public perception often is stronger than fact: imagine several Councillors continuing an arrangement of pecuniary benefit with City Hall when elected.
Would you trust that Council as a whole?
Would the not-benefiting Councillors trust the ones with whatever perceived inside-tracks?
Would such Council be a strong team?

While there are obvious issues with the Community Charter and City Procurement: it seems advisable for Richichi to either not continue/attempt to renew his contract if elected - even though this may seem impracticable for City/NPD/NFD! - or withdraw from running for Council.

One or the other!




Keeping it clean!




Image Credits:
Pinterest
City of Nelson


Frances Long, Admin Director
flong@nelson.ca

Sarah Winton, Deputy Corporate Officer
swinton@nelson.ca

Deb Kozak, Mayor
dkozak@nelson.ca

City Council
nelsoncouncil@nelson.ca