Presentation to the Committee of the Whole (COW), 19 Dec, 2016, by Nelson's Chinese-Canadian community, within the monthly 5 minutes allowed informally to individuals/groups from the general public:
Our proposal to erect a gazebo over the Commemorative Chinatown Rock was presented 5 months ago, and as of this date the Chinese-Canadian community is still waiting to be informed of a/the next step to be taken-or-not by whom.
This - after our response to the deliberately misrepresentative "Report" on said proposal by Colin Innes, Public Works, and Mayor Kozak's subsequent very public very forceful attempt to muzzle Council on the topic, in the COW, 17 Oct. - raises questions about due diligence, even simple goodwill within this Administration.
But then - in Nelson politics are usually personal. Public input is inconvenient - thus not sought. When in form of criticism - it is resented. My occasional presentations to COWs and in blog-posts clearly have not endeared me to some on the 2nd Floor: so stalling our proposal looks like grudge-payback.
Affecting the whole local Chinese-Canadian community.
And continuing to relegate this community to the same less-than position locked-in since the Queen City's early days - even though Victoria and Ottawa have officially acknowledged and registered the historical contribution of Nelson's Chinatown to the development of BC.
Heritage still a White-is-Might issue at Nelson's City Hall!
Having no confidence in our request to be granted due process - Nelson's Chinese-Canadian community herewith withdraws their proposal for a gazebo to symbolically shelter the Commemorative Chinatown Rock at Vernon & Hall.
End of presentation.
Cormack-
Council-
Public
We decided to discontinue our pursuit because the ultimately accountable-to-none City Hall 2nd Floor - with Kevin Cormack, Chief Admin Officer (CAO) absolutely in charge of things local - can come-up with any reason of their/his choosing for why there can't be a gazebo - no matter how unreasonable - to which our only opportunity to respond openly - in front of witnesses - is within the 5 minutes of the Public Participation segment of a COW long after the fact.
To make this clearer: The only time Council and an individual/group from the general public (briefly) interact is when the latter make an officially prearranged presentation to Council in a COW.
Council then may deal with this specific issue in an(y) upcoming Regular Council Meeting (RCM). This as far as they can - always based on info predigested and timed for them by Cormack in a Request for Decision - with the concerned outside-party not invited to participate.
They must wait until the next COW - several weeks later - with their input/response of 5 minutes tops, but Council will not make a decision then.
Because that is only made in RCMs!
An endless dance!
Bottomline: There usually is no here-now give-and-take between Council and concerned members of the public!
In our case, with the 2nd Floor's reasoning clearly bizarre - seemingly even somewhat unsettling to Council: they do not get involved decisively. What with politics within City Hall just as personal: they usually don't. And we can only watch from a distance.
Racism
While City Hall's attitude towards this gazebo - incidentally: to be funded by the Chinese-Canadian community - is unacceptable, it is understandable within the context of racist (governmental) attitudes towards non-whites prevailing in BC since its beginnings.
Examples (Chinese);
1.
The Exclusion Act becomes law on 1 July, 1923 (Dominion/Canada Day!): excluding most Chinese from immigration into Canada until 1947. The date making clear that Chinese are not, never must be Canadians.
By Chinese called Day of Humiliation.
2.
Between 1871 and 1949 those of Chinese descent can't vote in BC. And because they're not on the provincial voters-list - they can't vote federally!
Not being voters they can't become pharmacists, lawyers, accountants.
3.
Until 1951 the Chinese Clause in the Crown-Lease Act excludes Chinese from the system.
4.
In 1967, Chinese immigration (officially) is put on equal basis with that of other countries.
BUT!
Only in 1977 does the Citizenship Act (officially) dismantle preferential to-the-head-of-the-line treatment for British subjects applying for citizenship.
5.
In Surrey the Mongolian Bylaw of 1894 prevents all Chinese and Japanese from employment with the Corporation of Surrey. This bylaw theoretically remains in effect until 1982 when it is "discovered" on their books.
6.
In 2006 the Chinese Benevolent Society of Vancouver celebrates its 100th Anniversary. Michaelle Jean, our Governess General, congratulates the Society on its "Canadian spirit of generosity and compassion", while it is exactly the lack of any Canadian spirit of generosity and compassion which leads Vancouver's very marginally better-off Chinese community at the time to help those many among them left homeless, jobless, starving and ill by colonial moneymakers-at-any-cost.
This twisted "congratulation" coming from the person in Canada representing the inescapable pointless British queen over there. And her tiaras.
7.
Beverly J. Oda, of Japanese descent, Ottawa's Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women, sends her letter to this Chinese NGO in two side-by-side columns: one in English, one in French.
8.
"We are the one country everybody would like to be... We also have no colonialism. So we have all the things that many admire about great powers, but none of the things that threaten or bother them."
Stephen Harper, PM
Pittsburgh G20 Meeting, 25 Sep, 2009
9.
When, in 2010, requesting $1500 from Council towards the installation of a Commemorative Chinatown Rock we are rejected initially, with Councillor Stacey opining that a plaque on a building somewhere would do. Be cheaper.
Still - the rock itself is donated privately by Cherry's Rock Farm up in the hills, and Columbia Basin Trust promptly grants separately requested $1500.
10.
In 2011 we ask Mayor Dooley to dedicate the Rock, giving him enough time to prepare. A few minutes before the dedication he asks me what to say. What is this? Where am I?
11.
When he is just about to unveil the Rock, Dooley motions uninvited Councillor MacDonald to do it with him. Ignoring Cameron Mah, leader of the Chinese-Canadian community, who is standing right there.
Nelson - no matter how progressive it looks and claims to be - is deeply conservative (spelled colonial: the mother of heritage).
Though few here would openly cop to being racist: possibly many are not even in touch with what that means.
Whether by osmosis, design or suddenly pushed down the rabbit-hole by the gazebo-issue: City Hall's 2nd Floor certainly appears racist.
Mayor Kozak
dkozak@nelson.ca
Colin Innes
cinnes@nelson.ca
Kevin Cormack
kcormack@nelson.ca
flickriver
pinterest
uuhy
Li Huang Feng
NEWS:
Bill Metcalfe - back from a way too long vacation and seemingly fortified by it! - has a go at the lack-of-rental-housing thing in Nelson. Finally! Someone!
Report: Nelson's rental vacancy rate is 0.7 per cent
Bill Metcalfe, Nelson Star Dec. 6, 2016
To be found on the Star's website, under NEWS.
This basic what's-what City Hall so far hasn't been able to get its head around, despite by now habitual tut-tutting over affordable-rental-housing.
In Metcalfe's article, Trevor Jenkinson, realtor and president of the Landlord Association, says "... some(?) landlords have decided to stop long-term renting and go with short-term rentals instead because of bad experiences with tenants."
Weelll - this rather sounds like a lame excuse for wanting to go Airbnb, since frequently tenants claim: what with the well-known shortage of rental-housing (possibly the same "some") landlords often don't keep properties in good repair because they've got choices!
Tenants haven't and talk about living in overpriced dumps!
With Airbnb now legitimized by City Hall, quite conceivably more long-term tenants will be eased out to enable more conversions. Since short-term renters don't have the same concerns as long-termers: give it a coat of paint, and you're off to low overhead and funny-money!
COLUMN 1:
Then - there's the mayor's oddly titled oddly disconnected
COLUMN: Nelson deserves(?!?) a full range of housing options
Deb Kozak, Nelson Star Oct. 23, 2016
On the Star's website, under OPINION.
According to Kozak, vacation rental "discourages property speculation and encourages long-term rentals(?!?). It also protects the integrity of our neighbourhoods."
Go figure!
"It is exciting to see people move into their new home at the recently completed Nelson Commons project."
"Including affordable units in future is an exciting prospect and another possibility when new projects come forward."
Aside from all the excitement she also talks "vibrancy". Kozak's perky politico-patter could be frightening: it lacks genuine community-connect.
"The next step is to attract the people working in the knowledge industry. Living in spectacular surroundings and being able to work anywhere is within reach here."
And where - precisely - will they sleep!
Nowhere in this column of bytes does Kozak present any concrete and now-doable "housing options".
Column 2:
This is by a city councillor - making little of the point he promises.
COLUMN: Affordable housing a priority
Michael Dailly, Nelson Star Nov. 4, 2016
On the Star's website, under COMMUNITY
It goes on-and-on with beside-the-point introductory pleasantries, uses lots more space on food-policy, to only then get to what it has promised as priority: affordable housing. Not making clear what affordable housing means.
Actually - I don't remember anyone here ever publicly doing so!
After starting with Canada, then moving to BC: this barely touches on specific Nelson needs - with nothing concrete and now-doable either!
Though interesting here is that with the mayor attempting to sell the City to presumably youngish people in the "knowledge sector" - Dailly identifies "... those most in need of quality, low-cost rental housing include young people..."
Ships passing in the night.
While he says "Nelson's Affordable Housing Committee, council and staff (oops, no mayor!) are working to identify more incentives that encourage purpose-built rental housing and secondary units": nowhere in these two columns does he or Kozak mention anything originated and locked-in by Council. Even though " The lack of affordable housing remains primary focus of this council."
So here is something concrete and now-doable for City Hall:
1.
Not only rework the onerous water-rates on secondary (basement) spaces more flexibly - but also offer other (financial) incentives to homeowners for doing-up their basements as rental units.
2.
Offer free know-how assistance and (financial) incentives for turning part of a single-family house into a self-contained apartment. If scaling-back alone is used as motivator by people to give-up their homes and move into a condo - what about keeping them in their homes of many years - possibly decades - while making the property more manageable in a sort-of co-op model. Overall cheaper and easier to maintain!
3.
The lane-house idea has been bandied about for years: so legitimize it already! Give (financial) incentives to homeowners for building smaller, self-contained lane-units. Today available pre-fabricated, with multi-level efficiency and reasonably priced.
City Hall's priorities are skewed. (See the recent $42.600 wasted on a new Cottonwood Market never-to-be!) It is now paying an out-of-town "consultant" who-knows-how-much for a Baker Botox plan, surely followed by predigested whatevers - none of economic benefit to Nelson proper, all as always expensive - while we should be in crisis-mode over housing more than just skin-deep!
Applying funds based on need!
It's time for Council and the mayor - as a unit! - to take willing, hands-on responsibility in this emergency. Enough already with "working to identify more incentives."
Bill Metcalfe
bill.metcalfe@nelsonstar.com
Deb Kozak
dkozak@nelson.ca
Michael Dailly
mdailly@nelson.ca
www.nelsonstar.com
Credits:
Katharina Grosse
Paul Lester
Kwaku Boateng
Galerie Koenig
Following is a message sent to
Black Press, owner of the Nelson Star
18 Nov, 2016
David Black, Chairman / Rick O'Connor, President -
While reaching you through the Black Press website would seem the most straightforward - reader-friendly - way: that process in itself is an example of how divorced your home-base seems to be from the general readership out there.
I am expected to open a Microsoft Account just for this purpose! Whatever that may be, whatever that may entail - whatever I may be expected to hand-over of myself.
So I pass!
Yet this presents an interesting intro to my reason for writing to you: not being able to post comments in the Nelson Star, read those posted and email site-items.
Comments
Triggered by an immediate reaction - whether reasonable to others or not - they provide a look into how a/this community thinks, inter-connects. In Nelson they are the most direct gauge of the public's concerns, in/through - according to a survey - the most accessed local source of info: the Star.
Posting Comments
Only Facebook subscribers can post comments, but those who are not are invited to post also by signing-up - first! While the considerable number of non-subscribers probably are that for specific reasons, and the number of drop-outs from Facebook seemingly is growing: opinions of those readers clearly are not important to Black Press. Curiously - neither seems to be their advertising-generated dollar: ultimately the life-blood of a publication such as the Star.
Reading Comments
Reading them - this possibly even generating comments on comments - encourages, may shape the public's direction. Thus it can be a valuable tool for decision-makers at Nelson's City Hall, they frequently out of touch with real-time public sentiment.
Unable to post comments for ages as a non-subscriber to Facebook, for close to 2 months now I also have not been able to access comments to just read on the Star's website.
Subscribers seem able to - yet not for all is getting there a simple matter of just clicking on comment-numbers either: with no fixed sequential pattern and variations between electronic delivery-systems.
Then there is the problem with emailing website items. Following all instructions correctly, sending items leads nowhere - literally: the don't arrive!
The Star editor briefly responds to my concerns with: whatever it is, it needs to be and will be fixed in Vancouver - but they are busy! The Star publisher has not responded, neither has your "webeditor" in Vancouver.
Considering that Black Press advertises itself as "Community News Media" - this community would appreciate if you were to make an actual contribution to it by fixing the elementary problems above.
When you are not too busy.
In the meantime, you are losing readers' interest here (only?). Not a good idea, particularly this close to Christmas.
With concerns -
Claus Lao Schunke
Nelson BC
It is not clear whether problems-as-such originate with Facebook or in-house. But seeing that currently this non-subscriber has no access whatsoever to commenting/comments - while subscribers have, no matter how messed-up the process, this does lead to far-reaching - literally - Facebook implications.
In-control Facebook is uncomfortable - in-control Facebook out-of-control is scary!
San Francisco (AFP) - Facebook accidentally declared its founder Mark Zuckerberg and many other users dead on Friday, acknowledging after fixing the problem that it had committed "a terrible error."
"For a brief period today, a message meant for memorialized profiles was mistakenly posted to other accounts," a Facebook spokesperson told AFP.
Media reports indicated that some two million errant memorials were posted on profile pages.
Zuckerberg among Facebook users mistakenly declared 'dead'
Glenn Chapman, Nov 11, 20116
David Black, Chairman - Black Press
dblack @ blackpress.ca
Rick O'Connor, President, Operations BC - Black Press
ricko @ blackpress.ca
Eric Lawson, Regional Publisher (Nelson) - Black Press
eric.lawson @ blackpress.ca
Colin McGarrigle, Editor - Nelson Star/Black Press
editor @ nelsonstar.com
pinterest.com
Part 2 of a look at Railtown as-is and by-design. Part 1 can be found directly below this post.
City Hall Plaza
The space in front of City Hall is referred to in the largely ignored
"Sustainable Waterfront and Downtown Master Plan"
of several years ago, under
3.6.2 Proposed Plazas
as
"... an ideal location and size to become the City's primary outdoor living room."
This blog in several posts before/after the Plan encourages the City to make the Plaza actually representative of how it usually likes to advertise itself: certainly not as an uninspired/uninspiring space, with 8 poorly-cared-for-sort-of-dead flower-boxes for years en garde between steps and entrance.
City Staff pass by them at least twice a day.
Opposite is the obligatory monument to local war-dead. Actually the Plaza's core - deadzone. Of real interest in this could be: there are several small memorial plaques attached to the obelisk, below local/area names of those killed in 2 World Wars.
One for the Korean War (no names) and one for the Boer War (no names) in Southern Africa. The latter between the as usual bent on expanding colonies no-matter-how British and Boer settlers of Dutch descent, without a regular army and with indigenous slaves. Apartheid later institutionalized down there. The war is particularly brutal on/for both sides: 27.927 Boer civilians - mainly women and children - die in British-run "concentration camps" from diseases, malnutrition and exposure. Along with 20.000 indigenous Africans of the altogether 115.000 also forcibly kept in such camps. About 26.000 Boer POWs are shipped abroad - but not to colonial adjuncts Australia, New Zealand and Canada, all 3 having troops fighting for The Empire and the hell of it. Seemingly a few from Nelson, too - then at the height of its racist bluster.
City Staff pass by this show of Heritage gone sideways also at least twice a day.
While the Plaza could be a neutral space for rotating expressions of Nelson's finest in arts and constructive ideas now.
If we have the former - seeing that the quality of paintings (finally hung!) on the 2nd Floor desolation row couldn't possibly be as good as it gets in the Queen City. I mean - seriously!?
So the Star reporting that a sculpture by an indigenous artist has been placed in this Plaza - its name "Mother Bears Pray for Earth Healing" - comes as an uplifting surprise. The artist's name is Steinhauer (a German name, approximately and appropriately meaning "He Who Works With Stone").
I don't notice the sculpture: usually - like most - coming down the steps at their left and leaving on the same side, close to the struggling flower-boxes. Until one day remembering and looking around: to my surprise I see the Mother Bears on the other side, directly next to the steps, ducking below the - while generic in appearance loaded with intention - war-dead marker. Their colors blending into those of the ground, walls and memorial to make the Bears a sombre experience. Totally grey on grey in grey death.
Good enough not being good enough: a more supportive place would be on the grass, under trees, with space to be - and pray. Easy to be noticed there by all - particularly urgent as this is the first public-art piece in Nelson ever with artistic/spiritual depth in equal measure.
The sculpture here seems to indicate positive movement.
A direction!
Then the Star announces: the piece has been moved to the Nelson & District Chamber of Commerce (NDCC) in Railtown. Bummer! After all not a movement of intent towards artistic expression with depth in the Plaza - but only on loan to City Hall after the Castlegar Sculpture Walk and now for sale at $100.000. Whether the NDCC pays this or how much or whatever the arrangement is: we don't know.
And the City Hall Plaza returns to bland.
Railtown
I decide to track these Bears to the NDCC through Railtown - post-plan and post-market now that that is closed for the coming 6 months. Always will be - no matter what kind of market is put there somewhere for how much. Half the price for half the year?
For now in Railtown - with what there is over time solidified in a workable pattern, even though not necessarily efficient today within a larger context - buildings and streets have been accepted as are.
But the many cars now driven, parked and sold everywhere there will multiply with every bit of new development: light-industrial - parking; shops - parking; condos - parking; parks - parking; market - parking. Plus driving to/from. So with traffic bound to consistently increase, "improving" Railway St. by slowing it down - for instance - seems counter-intuitive!
While the extent of development-plans is commendable: their photos of example-possibilities are of/in locations with more space or little context - not within jumbled confines similar to pokey Railtown. Sketches of how things could be look grown-up and spectacular - though Pleasantville idealized.
And that's just how the Hall St. thing - the thus far only manifestation of the Community Plan - is sold to the public: photos, sketches and talk of leisure-walks through green spaces with art and benches down to the lake, prompted in writing as a "pedestrian friendly corridor with civic spaces" - and a Design Review Committee, run by Kevin Cormack, City Manager, in charge.
But here we are with the real-time redo!
Considering that Hall ends-up in free-fall, without hitting (the) bottom yet: who at City Hall approves piece-by-piece work of significance in Railtown? Is it Council? This time? Seeing they are never even near the loop on Hall.
While it's actually doubtful that more weighty Railtown development takes place soon - on "brownfields" needing to be nursed back to health ("earth healing") big-time. Why would anyone invest here, unless the area offers a large-scale people-magnet, consistently drawing local/out-of-town crowds. Only this ultimately to provide incentive for investment. Which unconnected bits and pieces can't.
A radical rethink makes a cultural center (literally/figuratively) - with adequate parking directly attached - the core of Railtown, from which development "organically" radiates. They'll beat down the door to invest when given a reason with legs! A cultural center provides that, puts Nelson as a whole on the map in a new way!
This rethink must start at City Hall. With its Plaza out front as Step #1!
CPR Station
I see the Mother Bears right across from its entrance - more ducking than praying. Parking to their left - parking to their right. In fact - parking pretty much all around: the Bears' new home actually is a narrow island with parking-spaces chomped out of it on the CPR side. On top of that (them!) the 2 soon to arrive locomotives - just a bit to their right behind them - will totally dwarf, overpower the Mothers. With nowhere near enough space for them to breathe, connect with the sky and pray quietly choo-choo! Trapped!
Parking at the CPR Station is triple-tier and understandably so:
1.
Council-approved parking: Beware - for a select few only, 24/7! Death for transgressors!!
2.
Driver-claimed reserved parking: Homemade Reserved signs on sticks. Anyone who needs to park here - go for it!
3.
Free-range parking: Wherever anywhere around here, as has been done by many downtown day-workers for ages.
Not by design - much of this post ends-up being about parking in Railtown. Bottomline: without space allowed for sufficient project-by-project parking as critical components - there can only be little development. Theoretically - putting all pieces of land for absolutely adequate parking in suggested projects together adds-up to a relatively huge chunk of Railtown real-estate. With consequences for development not realistically addressed in the Plan.
Example: It suggests that market-overflow (starting-off with overflow already!) can park at the Station. This is the worst kind of band-aid planning! Aside from the fact that there is little reliably available parking now, even with no market and few tourists.
With the Mother Bears - Pray(ing) for Earth Healing - hard-pressed to just make it themselves in this car park!
desktopperpaper.co
sculpturewalkcastlegar.com
androidcentral.com
colors.findthedata.com
kunzegallery.ca
spoonflower.com
This look at a (the) market down there is the first of two at what's going on in Railtown: now that its overall plans for plans have solidified into which possible option may eventually be of interest to developers. Usually for the same limited spaces/buildings - with "could" pretty much as far as it goes.
So, relax: nothing is happening/will happen for some time - if at all.
Except for a sort-of-market at one end maybe.
And The Chamber Theme Park at the other, with the Chamber of Commerce now the only one proactively running any Railtown-by-design activities: focused on itself with never flagging energy and limitless funds.
I am getting ahead of myself.
Market: Now
Out of necessity I start going downhill to the tent-setup when the Baker Market finishes for the year. The Baker Market - with colorful, energetic bustle right downtown: the only farmers' market making sense in Nelson. And there being absolutely no valid reason for not starting it earlier and not continuing until Mid-November.
I have heard from vendor/shopper-friends - and find out when I start going - downhill has little to recommend it now: fewer vendors and some packing it in earlier this year, fewer shoppers, paths muddy and the toilet a breathtaking disgrace. A few truckloads of cedar-chips and even just a modicum of attention to the toilet-facilities would have meant a great improvement for the indeterminate duration - but basic maintenance is not sexy!
Altogether the mood is rather subdued, and if it weren't for the Baker Market closing down some weeks ago.....! The buildings of yesteryear may have been in poor shape - but they anchored the market, gave it traditional purpose. Missing now!
Market: To Be
According to the Star, Oct. 23, 2016, City Manager Kevin Cormack said the city got a grant (what grant and how much?) to do the move, and has worked extensively with the EcoSociety (which runs the market) on the plan for the move. Move into what - and who at the EcoSociety, seeing that David Reid - main ego behind the project - quit as its director some time ago?
"This is more than a market, it is a park amenity," he said (Even to Cormack this is not about a farmers' market any longer - but what pray tell is a park amenity? Whatever it is - it will be larger than the park!), emphasizing that the new structures would be used for more than just the market (like what exactly?), and he said the plan is too far along to slow it down now. While this could be a way of keeping questions from the uninitiated - like Council and the public - to a minimum - it could also mean that the profit-pie has already been divided, with pieces (very) quietly handed to those found most deserving.
True: Neither Cormack nor the EcoSociety has kept the public informed of what is/will be going on down there. Their game clearly is not ours! But also true: The situation is whatever it may be largely because Council - while having had at least 4 major opportunities to slow down or stop the game altogether - has failed to do so by not raising the questions above and below.
This post will attempt to acquaint/reacquaint Council and the great unwashed with speed-bumps along the way.
1. Missed Opportunity
When a reincarnation of the Cottonwood Market first comes before Council - they without hesitation hand 12.600 taxpayer-bucks to the EcoSociety for a pre-plan plan. Few questions asked, no detailed explanations demanded. Even though the EcoSociety - a volunteer-run organization of treehuggers - aside from keeping the then-market on automatic - has no qualifications for creating such project from scratch. But - big but! - there is its name: 1 of our 2 sacred cows: Co-op and EcoSociety.
David Reid - still director then - takes on raising a few hundred-thousand. On his own! Handled!
Eventually the Cover Architecture Collaborative through Reid - unprompted by Council - comes up with a basic wish-list of points to possibly be included in a grand design. This list for our 12.600.
The buck should stop right here - with Council: establishing parameters for the project's function, rules for accountability within the gestation-process - overall control! Instead it very unimaginatively throws more and more bucks at the thing. And here it is/we are: nowhere!
2. Missed Opportunity
With no outside funding in sight after all - Reid asks Council for and promptly gets additional 30.000 taxpayer-bucks.
He later lists Kalesnikoff Lumber among several possible - not declared though! - contributors. Interesting here from an eco-treehugging angle: Kalesnikoff at the time is very unpopular in Glade, because their planned logging in a particular area there may threaten a watershed. One would think this to be right up the EcoSociety's raison d'etre - but apparently it isn't. Moneyhuggers!
More funding-goodies: Cormack introduces an anonymous "community business partner" who wants to "participate" in and "intends to contribute significantly to building the new structures." How (much) he wants to participate (in return) for his significant contribution is not divulged. This could get dodgy as Cormack clearly must have an in-depth relationship with his outside-business-partner in City Hall affairs.
Connecting rather large dots through the relevant Star write-up: Councillor Robin Cherbo asked if the new structures could be made of wood. Cormack responded that could be an option and that the unnamed business that has stepped forward "deals in wood."
No bells, no red flag, no nothing from Council!
Currently word on the street has it that the market-project is stalled due to a lack of sufficient funding.
3. Missed Opportunity
Cover Architecture comes up with a market-design totally lacking rudimentary weather-scenarios. Roofs of individual units afford little shelter from sun, wind and rain for vendors, shoppers, produce, merchandise. Also - their shape has rainwater run to the lowest point in their lengthways center-fold. Meaning: water will gush down unhindered from that fold, probably from both ends of unconnected units. This in turn meaning: anyone walking from unit to unit in the rain will have to dodge 2 waterfalls per unit multiplied by the number of units walked under. For shelter.
(See renderings here)
How up to 600 envisioned concert/festival-revellers are to be sheltered in-case (there won't be seating for anyone either) is not addressed.
Council and Staff - made aware of basic design-shortfalls - seemingly have taken no position. In fact -
4. Missed Opportunity
- after/with all this Council hands another 40.000 bucks to heaven knows who's in charge: an obscene almost third of Nelson's Columbia Basin Trust allotment for the whole year.
Marketing
So that's where we are now with this market-or-what: not knowing who's in charge; not knowing about necessary radical design-changes; not knowing when; not knowing about the facility's purpose - not knowing the how expensive eventually to taxpayers point of all this!
slcfarmersmarket.org
nelsonstar.com
splashdreamstime.com
"Freeland sounds despondent note amid failed effort to rescue Canada-EU deal"
Chrystia Freeland, Int'l Trade Minister:
"I personally have worked very hard, but it is now evident to me - evident to Canada - that the European Union is incapable of reaching an agreement, even with a country with European values such as Canada, even with a country as nice and patient as Canada."
"Canada is disappointed, and I personally am disappointed, but I think it is impossible. We are returning home. At least I will see my three children tomorrow at home."
Mike Blanchfield
Canadian Press, Oct. 21, 2016
We are a nice country I'm sorry with colonial values I'm not so sorry about and not at all apathetic like some say but patient.
I just want to go home and fix dinner I'm sorry.
Maybe have a cold one!
That's all I want!
pinterest.com
crafthubs.com
shirt.woot.com
