In the Regular Council Meeting (RCM), 7 Dec, 2015
Staff proposes to Council a
Request for Decision
Topic: Permit public WiFi at various public places
WhoFi
Staff is asking for approval after they conducted a simple informal - in a word: shallow - 2 question survey on the City's Facebook Page, with the majority of 168 respondents in favor of such service - any service that makes them feel countable.
While going this route may seem the logical - and simplest! - way to get a sampling of public opinion: this opinion may also be lopsided, what with many computer-users not automatically, rather deliberately not being Facebookers and an ever-growing number of such leaving the fold. Thus their opinion clearly of great and needed value in deliberations on how to possibly fashion-or-not a contract agreeable to all between the City and Shaw.
In the RCM Councillors are asked verbally only to approve a first-step contract between Shaw and the City. A copy of this contract is not provided. Which is regrettable, because ultimately Council approved what? Are they clear on that? As now we hear/read that Council approved installation of tower-to-tower zappers in our parks (my image - while to the point). Neither is true: seeing that this first-step contract - as told - is only an initial official response to Shaw's offer, no obligation in this - just one non-binding step towards possible negotiations aiming at later acceptance of Shaw service-installation.
The Nelson Star is a step ahead of this first-step contract with Nelson council backs Shaw's free Wi-Fi: it backs in principle but not in intent!
So the public must know - as Council must remember - that the City supposedly won't be obligated to open negotiations past this first-step door-opener. But what do we/they know: they only having voted based on verbals.
HowFi
In essence: free Shaw GoWiFi - in yet to be decided local locations - is to be available to those opening an account with Shaw - but also those having a contract with a different Internet Service Provider (ISP) already: as a sideline - literally.
What with Shaw seemingly totally prepared for whatever this may be(come for them) -we are not: possibly naively reaching for the apple, the golden egg - a free lunch. But as today there simply is no free corporate lunch: this service and process towards Nelson accepting it needs careful step-by-step scrutiny and deliberation.
Not just giving predictably boring fine-print a quick going-over - but taking enough time to understand it - in detail/total - to avoid unpleasant surprises later.
With Council in charge of contract-terms!
IfFi
When asked for more detailed info, Frances Long, Director of Corporate Services, says: that will not be provided by Shaw until the first-step contract has been signed. Even though she every so often drops factoids coming from being informed. If she is - why isn't Council?
Councillor Purcell raises 2 points - paraphrased here - crucial among many.
Q: Will Council get to participate in further steps of this process, following that of signing-off on opening negotiations?
A: That would usually not be the case but could be.
With bells going off in a big way - Purcell does not pursue, Long does not volunteer: while Council's presence in determining the content of an ultimate agreement is crucial. This is happening on their watch, is their responsibility to the electorate - with Staff's general position in relation to Council supposedly largely to implement their decisions.
This particularly in view of Staff's 3 recent disturbing decisions without Council's knowledge or consideration or consultation or approval:
Cottonwood Market; the Panhandling Bylaw; the 300 Block Hall.
Q: Will those signing-up for the service be able to cancel it when they wish to?
A: This will be looked at later. But cancellation clauses will be favorable.
Meaning what? On whose terms? This is a key-point: what with - for example - the difficulty of cancelling Facebook subscriptions, after those blatantly shopped around to anyone from commercial to political interests.
A double-whammy with this Shaw subscription: not only does it enable Shaw to mine info from parttime subscribers - but also from their fulltime ISPs. What with everybody's IP Address (IP) forever branded on their forehead.
RealityFi
According to Long: Shaw's intent with this freebie is getting users to switch to Shaw permanently. But why would they, how could they even: if locked into a contract with another ISP? Even those not bound to a contract - while with a free account! - would find moving their entire history from one ISP to another expensively daunting and most likely not do it. With a signing-their-life-away contract: just to have WiFi access on the occasional bench. Nattering away in the park. Irritating the crows.
Sooo ... the harvest of switchers would surely be minimal - particularly in contrast to the effort Shaw seems to be willing to make at great cost. Are they just stupid?
Or what's really going on here, planned for later!
JustiFi
Such as - alarming in the Request should be: Maintenance of the service will include the need to upgrade equipment as technology continues to advance. This sounds like a statement-of-fact - not just a possibility down the line. Rhetorical question: Upgrade for what purpose? What could/would that mean to an uninformed hapless subscriber and the City?
Leading to: what exactly are potential parttime subscribers to sign? What rights do they have exactly, and what exactly is their recourse if? We know that new fulltimers will look at a lengthy contract: their problem if that obtuse.
The parttimer-situation in turn leading to the City - approving signatory with Shaw - probably liable for unexpected weirdness arising later.
Ultimately the City must make the contract-to-install available in total to potential subscribers - before signing it. As - conversely - the City must be comprehensively aware of agreements to be signed between Shaw and subscribers to GoWiFi.
WhereFi
It's doubtful that tourists will be enticed with WiFi-in-the-park to come to Nelson, or if they happen to come to feel an itch to use their devices in the park: they will probably go to the park to park their brains a bit. Just as it's doubtful that locals must go there to diddle with their electronics.
On one hand we profess deep involvement with/in our natural environment and having to protect it at all costs - on the other Council has no qualms over giving that shop away to emotional plug-ins, encouraging them: they absolutely must transmit the most do-or-die info ever to someone/anyone right now! From a park!
Lakeside Park is a declared tobacco-free zone; much of it is declared dog-free - both for good reason: so why not have a zone for once! unpolluted by electronic addictions?
Councillors Warmington and Cherbo are to be commended on wanting to keep stuff human!
Having WiFi downtown is a different matter, may be useful to some. Although the Nelson Library, Touchstones, Capitol Theatre and Youth Centre becoming reliant-then-dependent on a corporate freebie is inviting trouble down the road.
How about Shaw Street, Shaw Arena, Shawtown?
WhyFi
It is for their constituency that Councillors - as people, individually - need to look at variables - coming from being electronics-users themselves - to be thoroughly familiar with and decisively prepared for Staff's next presentation of the topic: ostensibly and finally! the first-step hard-copy contract. Probably unfortunately after the fact by then. To possibly follow that independent-minded step after step. The more-often-than-not at-arms-length paper-push won't do!
This is not about opposition to Shaw GoWiFi per se: but being respectfully selective about locations for it and contract-provisions bullet-proof for the City in general and users in particular.
The willingness to look a gift-horse in the mouth.
Let's not have to figure all these things out in the field again.
Ever!
glitch.news.com
it.intel.com
techtimes.com
pcworld.com
Busyness
Talking with someone from the Columbia Basin Alliance for Literacy (CBAL) about today's deteriorating use of the English language on electronic devices - from there spilling over into online/hard-copy news-publications - particularly readers' commenting! - even academic papers OMG! Seeping into verbal communication as truncated snippets LOL! With editing to keep it clean frequently gone. I figure she would be the one to talk with about it: she's teaching (computer-)literacy. Her immediate response: Today everybody's sooo busy. Why would everybody's routine be busier today than it used to be, I ask.
So busy with what OMG!
Unless it's because you're making yourselves available - and expecting others to - at all times, in any situation: through smart phones, pads and laptops. Im/compulsively swapping largely emotional Spam.
While without this 24/7 superficially convenient availability you would be far less busy than you are today. More rested, less fragmented, better organized: more productive. Not to forget less dead LOL from driving into stuff!
When all gets to be too too much, messages waiting and all: your portable just may spontaneously combust - which supposedly happened to a guy in South Korea. I can see it! Exploding brains! Yes! LOL!
The smaller (more portable) the device - the greater the probable distraction: expressing itself in often unfocused back-and-forth. Tiny screens with info in tiny bits - in a field of vision inescapably filled with a lot of world around them. Surely necessitating much clarification-but-no: much too busy you need to choose and simply do not reply - even delete - game over!
BTW worth mentioning and never before: what with these portables doable anywhere and the toilet a favorite refuge of relative calm from life as you know it: you wash your hands after, but do you wash your portable? In fact - do you ever?
No shit EW!
Anyway - in generally connecting electronically - you're not talking (in) much depth any longer - and few expect it. OMG! Becoming an issue on PCs as well - even though there having enough space to expound. Dumbing-down each other - this usually facilitated by your smarter-than-you minders' structural strings attached.
And apps!
Be appy!
On and on you go - not so much busy as prompted-busy. While promising to help organize your busyness: the clutter of always more must-have apps now possible to be managed with apps specific to managing just your apps-clutter. Like by a big brother who really really understands you LOL!
Flying thumbs tapping buttons in endless sequences. With more and more of you lining-up to buy the latest. Hooked on it, them - and signing-up on yet another site to be please-look-at-me noticed. Neediness among an astonishing multitude cleverly imprinted, nourished with promises of belonging. Friends, Likes, Thumbs Up - especially only just for you! And others similarly challenged. Killer-games simulating personal power - take-that! revenge a favorite. All living within the same illusory support-system.
How comfy is that LOL!
While your tiny-print agreements signed, sealed and delivered you to the same very Big Brother's now-and-future wiles. You are on sale and resale down the rabbit-hole!
As one teensy price to pay for all this: invisible, untouchable, unfeelable-so-far rays nudge your brain while you're in Sorry-but-I-really-must-get-this! mode OMG!
At Stanford University computer sciences are the top: every upstart wants to start a start-up to give specifically you and only you more app-choices: appealing to anyone from silliness-geeks to medical-care providers. There are about 97.000 apps for the latter alone.
For many of these upstarts there's the - purely coincidental, of course - buy-out billionaire-overnight thing LOL.
In The Beginning ...
There were specific times and places for electronic info-transfer of word, image, motion and sound. The proverbial time and place for everything. The fixed location of a very heavy desk-top; a large screen for graspability in total; fingerpad-size keys; a comfortable chair.
Power on - get it done - power off - walk away - time-out!
In time-out you had a sociable network. With less time now because the desk-top shrank/morphed dramatically to become movable: much of your sociable network has flat-lined into the so-called social network OMG!
Listening/Reading-Comprehension
Back to CBAL. Years ago I took their training to become a language-mentor for newcomers. Most important - to me - in this training was looking at two kinds of listening/reading-comprehension:
knowledge-based and information-based.
Knowledge-Based
Material presented in a two-way (on devices, too) filters through the receiver's prior familiarity with it: actual or imagined, guessed - pretended. Possibly limited, probably subjective. With a response then from within those parameters - not necessarily rooted in the material as presented, not to-the-point OMG! Miscommunication. Ships passing in the night. Misunderstanding. Stuck.
Reading "static" information - as reader coming from the same place - leads you to superficial absorption/digestion of it and ultimately inappropriate decision-making.
Look familiar?
EW!
Information-Based
You are open to the material/opinion presented. Wanting to understand fully - then communicate appropriately. Objectively. With intention, focus.
And all the time it takes!
You have 1 new message:
Affective/effective communication of constructive information
LOL!
colourbox.com
zedge.net
paperest.com
filterforge.com
Mayor Kozak has to be commended - complimented, really - on becoming: colorful!
Bright color - a definitive so-there! statement - energizes, enlivens - while a large part of why the general vibe of City Hall is muted at best is the physical dullness of the premises: surely influencing - while in reverse influenced by - the energy-level of its inhabitants - expressed through hushed color-choices in manner of personal expression and appearance.
Smallishtown politics and the power of beige!
When Councillor Purcell speaks-up emotionally for life-giving color in the possibly suburbia-by-the-lake of Nelson Landing: she has a huge point! Huge enough to as well cover City Hall - a building totally devoid of positive expression of: anything!
Isn't it curious that the White Building - ostensibly the source from which all things affirming flow - is really the Bland Building? With no attempt made ever to color it alive - with individuality of most inhabitants checked at the door upon entering!
Our feast of autumn-colors is over now - we do like color in nature: impersonal and non-threatening there - but the last few weeks have brought up the inevitable heartburn of about 6 drab months. This - no matter how much we profess to love Nelson - a (usually non-declared openly) bummer for many, no amount of Vitamin D, coffee and commenting in the Star will cure.
Getting out for a while is a statement without the commitment of a statement.
For most it's just more splashing in and being splashed by shades of mud-puddle. But then - Nelsonites usually are: minds dressed in Benjamin Moore's heritage-color chic.
The comfort of non-committal in a town where politics are uncomfortably personal; business is uncomfortably personal; the personal is uncomfortably cliquish: and all interconnected by calculated need - often at the same time - can be furtive-making.
Watch it - watch out!
True friends stab you in the front.
Oscar Wilde
Creativity and color are inexorably bound together. Not only as moonbeams and fairie-dust - but also as focused insight coming from being thoroughly informed, particularly in an environment of often seemingly mind-numbing photo-copied routine: like the Council Chamber.
With the energy of personal coloring - showing your true colors - there having the power to turn halfhearted attempts into determined challenges: this leading to solutions of benefit to the greater whole.
The power of transforming never-diminishing stacks of paper into: people!
Applying creativity - as in effective connecting, planning - is part of Council's purpose. As is fostering it as well as the moonbeam-kind.
There has been undefined talk in Council of using creativity in dealing with the panhandling-bylaw impasse: come spring when light(ness) returns. Often it takes creativity wearing sensible shoes to be able to spring forth from the great beige.
Council's reception of/reaction to the cop-shop's Provisional Budget (PB) 2016 - COW 16 Nov, 2016 - is totally colorless. Seeing that this supposedly is an exact rerun of the bizarre PB 2015 - a long eventful year ago! - a possibly gotcha!-question is: Does the NPD today perceive Nelson-in-total exactly as it did one year ago?
Clearly there is no love lost between Council and the NPD in this presentation - but Council not making a public effort at connecting with the cops is not creative - constructive.
A P.R. opportunity missed. The need to be constantly/consistently mindful of the audience - the public! - comes with the territory.
Interestingly - in the same COW - a cultural presentation by the color/creativity-hub Touchstones - heavy on props never used - is completely lacking in color and creative energy: supercilious and boring.
Councillors must challenge their own, each other's and concerned citizens'/groups' individuality openly, strongly! Stroking can easily appear to be beige. As will attempting to safely blend-in-or-maybe-not with what?
Pale silence can be interpreted as disinterest, a hidden agenda, fear, being uninformed or wanting to just go home please now please!
Society exists only as a mental concept; in the real world there are only individuals.
Oscar Wilde
Showtime! Show-and-tell time!
In living color!
Images:
Jean-Paul Goude
Memphis
In the Committe of the Whole (COW), 16 Nov, 2015: Council - rather Kevin Cormack, CAO - decides - has decided already! - that the Cottonwood Market (CM) structures will be torn down next week. While Council raises several strong points: ultimately it stops short, it caves - ignoring a larger picture of Railtown-as-a-whole.
Due Process What!?!
Last time around we have the contrived Request For Decision for a panhandling bylaw - this time the CM is neither on the Agenda nor introduced as a Late Item at the beginning of the COW. Only towards the end brought-up sort-of and just-like-that: then - predictably - with a minimum of public scrutiny and no fuss from a pesky citizenry not there there to begin with or not any longer!
Because info of this item to be presented has been deliberately withheld!?!
Clearly - a lesson was learned from the public's inconvenient reaction to the previous announcement of impending CM demolition.
Seeing that this plan for a plan has been in the works for some time among Cormack, David Reid, EcoSociety, and Cover Architectural: there can be no justifiable explanation for the CM not on the Agenda.
What with this not getting into the Star (and Nelson Daily) until the 19th in
Cottonwood Market stalls to be torn down next week
Bill Metcalfe
by the time you read about it here the CM as you know it probably is the CM as you knew it - and undesirables will be elsewhere. Done! You blinked - you missed it!
Dangerous What!?!
Unfortunately Councillor Purcell doesn't pursue a definitive clarification with her poignant question exactly how are they dangerous - referring to the market-structures - and is satisfied with: Staff said so.
Why! Because!
Definitive as in: if they are dangerous now - when did they become dangerous so suddenly? Why wasn't this determined sooner when - following this scenario - some serious damage could have been done on any crowded Saturday - or any day for that matter - in the past! Raising the liability-issue now seems simplistically good enough for us. Even Reid says foundations and walls are in good shape.
Railtown What!?!
A new CM should be envisioned as naturally within the heart of the Railtown development: a multi-purpose meeting-place.
Traditionally a market always part of a center.
Telling us that a (separate, totally independent!) design for it can be completed that does not impact the large Railtown planning work ignores that, is presumptuous, grabby and potentially limits the scope of overall planning. It is not collaborative! What with Cover Architectural - the CM plan-planners - vaguely all over the place in a big way - literally - on crucial Railtown real-estate: the designer of the whole - already hired, working, he was here first! - may now have to wait until Cormack/Reid egos have decided on a design for their stand-alone me-me-me! with-all-its-bells-and-whistles CM.
So - hello, Council! - we are now looking at two probably competing plans - within no vision at all for the whole!?!
While - superficially - it's commendable that a local business intends to significantly contribute to building the new structures - not naming it makes the intention questionable, as must its motivation be questioned.
The EcoSociety will be happy with all this, but Reid's narrowly defined, self-promoting vision hardly comes from benefit to the greater whole - making fundraising-efforts for it unsupportable.
So What!?!
Our tax-dollar is to pay for THEIR plan - not OURS, because while there supposedly will be room for public input in the grand scheme of things - initially planned for this month!?! - there doesn't seem to be any within this sizable CM extravaganza. May this - may that.
More appropriately - such funds could be used towards fixing roof, wiring and what-not of the structures-as-are. This as temporary solution until an overall Railtown plan turns into a tangible reality - with a CM part of it - surely at least 3 years down the road.
I feel manipulated - and I don't like it!
According to legislation, the Nelson Police Department (NPD) - through its Board - has to present to Council a Provisional Budget (PB) by the end of November for the following year. This requested - and in the meantime still tweakable - game-plan then approved-or-not within Council's general financial budgeting for that year.
Such PB was submitted, 16 Nov, 2015, by one member of the Nelson Police Board (NPB) and Deputy Police Chief Burkart - although the
REQUEST TO APPEAR AS DELEGATION says
Chief Constable Holland will present the budget accompanied by Deputy Chief Burkart, Police Board Directors Roger Higgins (Municipal representative), Robert Goertz and Barb Henry (Provincial representatives).
From 5 down to 2, with the top missing. Probably in a pout. Still. Or else distancing himself from all of it: while originated by him - left to his successor to sort.
PB 2016 is - supposedly - an exact rerun of PB 2015: that at the time rejected by Council and now/still looked at elsewhere by the Director of Police Services.
While he is deliberating: one expects Council will compare PB 2016 word-for-word with PB 2015. Just in case - seeing that the parameters have changed considerably.
Sparse info attached to the agenda of the above Council Meeting simply states
OUR NEEDS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE OF 2015
AN INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED STRENGTH OF TWO CONSTABLES + ONE ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR
while not mentioning the PB 2015 price-tag of $311.000.
"Supposedly an exact rerun" as one wonders why PB 2016 was not attached to the agenda. Can't be found on the NPD/NPB website.
Following are salient points from PB 2015.
More detail to be found in post
Cop-Shop Deluxe
20 Jan, 2015
and as lead-in to that in
Fund-a-mental Nelson!
31 Dec, 2014
1.
Hands-on: Cash!
Before presentation of PB 2015 the NPD kept vigorously beating its drums - in the endlessly obliging Nelson Star - about being ever so stressed by just about uncontrollable masses of homeless, druggies and mentals. Only to be got under firm control with more cops and/or a Car 87. This drumming continued after presentation of PB 2015, asking for a budget-increase of $311.000 for additional cops yet no Car 87. Homeless, druggies and mentals not mentioned in it either.
Then drums went silent. Neither the NPD nor the Star explained this abrupt switch to not a single homeless, druggie, mental - and limo-service for them - any longer!
Unless the whole thing had been just a PR stunt to get this - to most everybody else unreasonable - budget-increase, and the cop-shop had realized the increase was a no-go!
2.
Heads-on: Intentions!
How this cash-inflow would influence the cop-shop is - almost verbatim - lifted from a book:
The Seven Essential Principles of Police-Based Crime-Reduction
by
Drs. Irwin Cohen/Darryl Plecas -
both teaching at the University of the Fraser Valley (UFV). Where they published this work: very shortly before presentation of PB 2015 and without relevance to the Nelson-beat where we - according to Chief Holland - have a relatively low crime-rate to begin with.
Plecas - then fervent advocate against legalization of pot and frequent advisor to cop-shops and the RCMP - his UFV Chair funded by the latter - has a reputation among some academic peers for unorthodox research-methods. Ironically - around the same time - cop-shop members of his home-base Abbotsford were under official scrutiny over irregular practices.
Hands-off!
If PB 2016 is an exact repeat of PB 2015 one must wonder at how much of PB 2015 applies even less today. Clearly - like any other place in BC - we have challenges with homeless, drugs and mental health. But today nobody here - including the NPD - claims their numbers and impact to be out of control. We are prepared to work on this collectively. Which should moot the NPD's budget-increase for more cops: homelessness and mental health not within their expertise anyway!
While reference to the dubious and irrelevant-to-us crime-fighter commandments from out of town - backbone of PB 2015 - should have been replaced with something reality-based - something now/here!
The NPD today actually-really is a man short because Cst Turner - presently(?) under house-arrest - is an unworkable twice-proven liability. They would be well-advised to let him go and hire someone fully functional within the cop-shop and community. This in itself surely would raise the level of cop-morale - thus overall in-house-and-out effectiveness.
Adding bizarre to bizarre: the Nelson tax-payer - not Turner, not the NPD, not the NPB - got stuck with Turner's legal costs. How much - has not been made public!
Public confidence in the NPD/NPB? Not so much, Director Pecknold, Police Services!
Council will be in an unenviable position concerning the current NPD budget-proposal: if identical - this even less acceptable than the last.
Cutler-and-Gross Lookbook
Nelson city council balks at Wi-Fi in parks
Bill Metcalfe - Star, Nov. 10, 2015
There possibly actually definitely is something to the brain-and-whatever-zap-damage scenario: the astonishingly boringly repetitiously pointless more than ever before on any topic comments in the Star substantiate that point.
What point was that again?
3 Points:
1.
Free? Internet Service Providers give nothing away for free - period! No free food! First the hook - then the catch!
2.
The person marveling at mothers then able to take kids to the park and get some work done on their thingie: at the same time. While the kids drown. How good is that!
3.
Oh, Nelson!
Federico Solmi
Justice and judgement lie often a world apart.
Emmeline Pankhurst
1858 - 1928
Plus in Canada both coming from an anything-goes judiciary.
Poor Judgement Nesteroff
It's not just the Nelson Star - go-to local news-source - disallowing commenting on Turner-trial-shenanigans: muzzling readers who may have and should be encouraged to raise concerns around this. Even though the Star itself editorializing for Cst. Turner's dismissal from the Force. Go figure!
Journalistic responsibility, democratic voices and all that. Here still the same old Harper shutting-them-down-to-shut-them-up thing!
In progressive, mindful Nelson!
Poor Judgement Turner
It's also not just an off-duty cop - disregarding on-duty fellow-cops on the scene - beating an out-of-it, half-his-size, handcuffed woman into unconsciousness, punctuating the job well-done with That will shut her up! - and driving off. Later repeating his alpha-chant similarly to a dispatcher. And Court discovering this cop has lied repeatedly about the assault.
(In the judgement, 11 Feb, 2014, of
Mason v. Turner
2014BCSC211
against defendants
Cst. Drew Turner, Chief Cst. Dan Maluta, City of Nelson
the Court rejects several of the charges, while finding for the plaintiff - regarding a police search - and fines the City of Nelson $500.00 over the same Turner's involvement. Is this on his record? Charges against Maluta are dropped earlier in the trial.
Commenting in the Star is disallowed on that occasion as well. Neither does it mention that trial while reporting this trial.)
Poor Judgement Hewson
Primarily this is about Richard Hewson - judge for almost 2 years - giving Turner a month of R&R at the strong bosom of his family and friends in his stable community residence: bolstering the conditional sentence with most disingenuous mitigating circumstances.
While That will shut her up! - and its repeat! - seem clear indicators - plural! - of a troubled individual: not so to the judge.
Mitigating Circumstance - Counseling
It was reported in Court that Turner has been attending counseling since December 2014. Meaning: he started whatever kind of counseling about 7 months after his way-unbalanced violent outburst: usually called a rage! but by the judge in the heat of a moment in a chaotic situation. Which - incidentally - seems to have been largely created by Turner.
Roid rage? Mental-health issues?
We don't know why counseling was not sought earlier by Turner and mandated by the cop-shop - what with Turner conceivably a threat: still on desk-duty - working together with those who testified against him and others there who may be critical, may not want to be associated by the public with such behavior.
We also don't know how often he was counseled - is he still: now that the trial is over? - and with what professional (out-of-town expert) assessment/conclusion.
Mitigating Circumstance - Character References
Hewson said he had been presented with a number of character references for Turner from members of the community ... Turner and his Lawyer John Green had enough time to get these references organized - a most basic ploy to influence judgement: it worked! - and they should have been accepted with a grain of salt: in Smallishtown, where everything is personal.
Mitigating Circumstance - Job Loss/Reputation
... faces the loss of his job, and has suffered a loss of reputation in the community. Why should/could/would a more lenient sentence save his job and reputation?
After all - everybody convicted of a crime faces these possible consequences!
And according to Hewson - in the same breath - should: When a police officer breaches the public trust and engages in illegal activity, even if off duty, it undermines the public confidence in the police and the rule of law. Turner - indeed - was convicted of a crime in the line of/off-duty, and if he loses his job because of what led to that, and his reputation has suffered because of what led to that - he had it coming! What makes this exceptionally brutal cop a cuddled exception in Court?
Mitigating Circumstance - Letter of Apology
This apology from Turner to Tawny Campbell - his punching-bag - was sent about 1 month before sentencing and about 15 months after the assault - rightly found to be too little, too late by Prosecutor Debra Drissell. Clearly one more ridiculously transparent attempt to influence his sentence - again working: Hewson, however, said he would accept this letter at face value.
Mitigating Circumstance - Family & Friends
Hewson cited Turner's strong relationship with his family and friends who will support him, his stable residence in the community ... What support exactly does he need he can't get in jail? What does Hewson know about what they will do? What does he know about their strong relationship - aside from the undoubtedly glowing character references family and friends predictably produced?
All this in my Brigadoon!?
Yup!
Direct quotes are from the Star's lengthy reports on trial/sentencing.
Richard Hewson: Vernon Morning Star
nintendolife.com
writersandartists.co.uk
@calcopwatch
